The chief articles found in thre A/S tombs were either made by the A/S themselves
or their continental neighbours.
Not one, as far as I am aware, has claimed any to have found anything associated with Scotland.
Why you are incapable of thinking that the Cruit were not also "neighbors" of the Anglo-Saxons is beyond me.
How you can invent cultures defeats me and I suspect you have something of a "reputation" with archaeologists in Ohio. Except to say one one casts no aspersions on Ohio culture. One only hopes the relevant uthorities keep this individual far away from any sites.
Well, here's a few hints.
Archaeology does not take place in a vacuum.
Well in your head it kind of does since you make such idiotic assestions.
All scientific work is done by PEOPLE,
Yes people who have education, not self opionated moronic ranters who can't read a book and seem riddled with ridiculous prejudices
and they have motivations for doing it.
Who the fuck cares. Your motivations are pretty obvious. An ignored fool with a desperate desire to make himself relevant in a world that wisely takes no notice of his ranting.
The significance of any site is shown by peoples' interest in it,
Too moronic for words. So Disneyland is a great archaeological site is it? It is the scientific importance fool. Only three people might be working on it, but that does mean it lacks importance?
and that interest is often demonstrated by their visits to it.
Those visis stimulate the local economies.
Yeah and frequently destroys and damages the site eg Pompey, Giza, Carthage etc etc etc. But hey maybe you can give away a few pamphletts
On a deeper level,
there is a continuity with the past
that local residents often find comforting.
i wondered when this age old crank shite would come up. Feel connected to the past do you? Invoke the spirits of the local native peoples do we? Don't speak the language of course, do not understand the religion but hey I can put feathers in my hair.
Frankly people like you disgust me. Wearing bedsheets and silly hats and claiming to be druids. Demanding entrance to Stone Henge so they can caper about waving silly wands and claiming to be channeling their ancient ancestors.
what do you do? Put on the buffalo skin, find the nearest mound or site and then jump up and down pretending to be big chief Buffalo Arse or some such blasphemous, disrespectful rubbish to encourage the tourists.
These people and people like you do a lot of harm to the study of archaeology. Citing a Saint's life as a major source for analysis then admitting one cannot actually read any of the languages. Farcical
Code: Select all
Well, they are about to have a new major site to visit.
I refer to my former comment. Better get out the Buffalo Skin and the pamphletts.
I think we may conclude with ease that you have never been
on a proper archaeological dig (as in doing the digging)
Well, yes I have, and frankly its boring as hell, unless the site promises very very interesting finds.
Myself and my associates generally enjoy finding sites,
and seeing to their preservation,
leaving the digging for others.
Yeah as I though yu haven't actually been involved in a proper dig. If you had been you would know it is not simply about "finds". That is treasure hunting.
And while you can read Latin,
Which you cannot
you appear to be incapable of any more advanced Latin text work,
such as deconstruction to sources,
Unlike some moron who claims to be able to do so even though he cannot read latin or any other ancient language. And who has no idea how to read Saint's lives.
Computer analysis of a text,
or even the preparation of a text for computer analysis of its vocabulary and grammar.
Ah so now we run to technology. Well sorry Chief Bull's Arse you have to know what to ask the computer and what to make of the results and for that yu need a very thorough knowledge of the text. Which you do not have.