Right let us now deal with you
I agree. And by facts we mean basic geography and the ability to write in english. If you could master these then your life would be much richer.
I do not quite understand how we can have a discussion free from facts.
Buy then "discussion" for you is you haranguing us about the virtues of the Anglo Saxons.
Oh and I have not mentioned the virtues of the Anglo Saxons (whatever they are) - that is you trying to find something to say.
Because we are talking about English speakers like you old fruit. You are an aculturalised Anglon Saxon.
Globally, you could compare the number of Chinese speakers, the number of Spanish speakers, etc.
But clearly the rest of humanity clearly plays no role in your definition of "we"
In general, after and during the period the Germanic mercenaries seized control of an area,
they adopted Roman methods of administration,
both to preserve the economies of the areas they had seized
and to legitimize themselves within the Empire.
But you told us repeatedly the German mercenaries wiped everyone out. So who taught them how to be Roman? Ghosts?
Youliterally cannot keep a logical thought in your head for longer than a five year old
The accuturalization you need to examine is the accuturalization of the Anglo Saxons.
Hence the enormous studies devoted to the conversion. Which you have never heard of.
That is why the coronation at Hinba is so important,
and why it is important to determine where Hinba was,
and then to excavate it.
Sorry web trawling again - completely incoherent - the phrase simply does not make sense.
And is also is beyond your feeble mind
But the problem of Anglo Saxon acculturalization is not a problem I'm interested in.
My interests are the PIE language group and recent small impacts.
But I cannot be bothered to actually learn any relevant language so no PIE for me
Have I at any time said such contrived rubbish was of any interest?
Now determining exactly where the Anglo Saxons and other Baltic Sea raiders
were at the time of the Kaali impact
and locating any memories they may have had of that impact are not important to you,
but they are of interest to me,
Oh you were certain a few posts ago. Changing our mind are we?
as is the possible destruction of Bazas by impact.
To put it more plainly,
I'm interested in Caledonians, and have little interest in Anglo Saxons.
To put it more plainly?
How does this comment lead in any way from the one before. Simple incoherence.
This sounds a bit drunk again.
Before the age of steam,
before the harnessing of water power,
British rationalism had manifested in superior ships and artillery,
and navigation and map making
during the period of colonialism and empires.
But any examination of the facts of that
is beyond your racist views, which manifest in your Anglo Saxon obsession.
Given your views, I could not endorse you for any position teaching in archaeology or history,
and I hope that no one has ever given you the chance to teach anywhere.
Well we know you would not have been trusted near a school wouldn't we.
And someone who cites the Nazis is not in a strong position as regards racism are they.
Did you watch it? and I beleive Sesame Street mentioned Scotland at some stage - what more do you need?
The strengths of English as a language were covered in the history of English television series.
All of us are descended from people just trying to get by,
people who worked very very hard just to survive.
Really? Just discovered this truism have you? And here's the thing - some of them were gay, so your filthy attempt to use the word gay as a term of abuse slightly undercuts you and yur faux christianity and views on morality.
All the more reason then to study their cultures without making racist comments eh