The Hobbit = textbook Darwin

The science or study of primitive societies and the nature of man.

Moderators: Minimalist, MichelleH

Re: The Hobbit = textbook Darwin

Postby Cognito » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:54 pm

Cogs: Just how, within the confines of Darwinian evolution and island dwarfism, did the Hobbit wind up with foot morphology similar to that of A. afarensis?

RS: ... we (you) should be extremely wary of attributing properties to a species' variant on the basis of less than 10% of 2 individuals' skeletal remains.

Alright, RS. Explain how any H. erectus possessing a fairly modern human anatomy from the neck down could develop the following type of archaic foot as a result of island dwarfism? Retrograde genes?

Image

Please read the article here before responding.
Natural selection favors the paranoid
User avatar
Cognito
 
Posts: 1601
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 10:37 am
Location: Southern California

Re: The Hobbit = textbook Darwin

Postby Rokcet Scientist » Wed Dec 15, 2010 3:38 am

Cognito wrote:
Cogs: Just how, within the confines of Darwinian evolution and island dwarfism, did the Hobbit wind up with foot morphology similar to that of A. afarensis?

RS: ... we (you) should be extremely wary of attributing properties to a species' variant on the basis of less than 10% of 2 individuals' skeletal remains.

Alright, RS. Explain how any H. erectus possessing a fairly modern human anatomy from the neck down could develop the following type of archaic foot as a result of island dwarfism? Retrograde genes?

Image

Please read the article here before responding.


Simple evolution. The Hobbit climbed trees! Probably to eat and avoid being eaten. And consequently the Hobbit's anatomy adapted to the circumstances. Just like some HS (?) on Indian and Pacific Ocean islands today, who have visibly more "ape-like" feet – long and wide, with a 'gripping' large toe – than we in the west do. Because they climb (palm) trees every day, every week, their whole lives long. As did all their ancestors. For millennia.
Rokcet Scientist
 

Re: The Hobbit = textbook Darwin

Postby Digit » Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:23 am

Which requires the assumption that HE didn't climb trees and that the Hobbits did.

Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
User avatar
Digit
 
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Previous

Return to Anthropology and Primitive Societies

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron