"Kalopin"
Study up on stratigraphy and see, all the 'credible documentation to support' is readily viewable on any satellite!
Listen- you get this site analyzed and if I am wrong, I will apologize to you. If I am correct, what will you say? :? Until you can find one little 'shred' of something to argue against an impact scenario, you have no 'platform' to stand on! So 'address' on! You will only embarrass yourself!
Let us attempt to address your various confusions one point at a time. As a brief preamble, it must be again stressed that no one is under any obligation to prove you wrong. The NMFZ and the Embayment, due to their rather unique properties, have been the subject of many decades of qualified research and are surprisingly well understood. Should you disagree with these understandings, it is
your responsibility to validate your speculations through thorough and documented research. To date, this latter aspect has apparently not been demonstrated. Points of address:
1) You have repeatedly referred to satellite views in incorporation with the term stratigraphy. Unless you have satellite views of trenching, road cuts, etc., you would be referring to topography,
not stratigraphy. This is a very critical distinction.
2) Your repeated references to "impactites" would not appear to have been validated by anyone qualified to evaluate lithic specimens. In fact, it would appear that what responses you have received (including my own) identify these specimens as being of a sedimentary nature. This is, of course, consistent with the geomorphology of your locale as demonstrated by the previously supplied documentation.
3) You have professed to have visually identified nanodiamonds within the sedimentary materials in question. This has been demonstrated to be an inaccurate assessment.
4) You have professed to have examples of molten ferric material incorporated into the matrix of the sedimentary materials. This aspect has yet to be clearly presented or verified.
5) You have clearly demonstrated a lack of understanding in regards to the complex geological formational processes of the landform upon which you reside. This is despite the references provided.
6) You have additional demonstrated a lack of understanding in regards to the life and writings of W. Clark. The following are quite lay-oriented, but, as you do not appear to be inclined to conduct more detailed research, will need to suffice for the moment. [Note: Yes, it does pain me to again utilize Wiki. However, in this case, the reference is heavily based upon the qualified research of Buckley].
http://www.scienceviews.com/historical/ ... clark.html
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr= ... 11&f=false
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Cl ... xplorer%29
7) Your understandings of the process(s) of permineralization are so tragically inaccurate as to be disturbing. Should you wish further detailed information in regards to this specific topic, do inquire. Will not bother to elucidate upon such in this response.
8) Your exaggerated comment in regards to a "frozen river valley" would also appear to indicate a lack of understanding in regards to both the climatology of the period and the realities of frost level penetration in the area of concern.
Given the extent of the lack of substantiation for your speculation, there is little likelihood that any professional would bother to "analyze" your property without remuneration. This is an aspect that you have apparently already encountered. In essence, the research has already been conducted. However, should you choose to pursue professional investigation, you would be advised to hire a licensed geologist from your area. By doing so, you will reduce your overall expense in regards to travel, per diem, etc. By contacting the below, you should be able to locate a professional in your area that could provide you with an estimate for services rendered.
http://www.msbrpg.ms.gov/Pages/default.aspx
Edit: Plural