Moderators: Minimalist, MichelleH
Minimalist wrote:If you start piling up anything it will, of necessity, be wider at the bottom than at the top. This is for stability not symbolism.
Once you get the idea to do it subsequent kings will look to out do their predecessors in their devotion to "the gods." That's human nature and especially kingly-nature.
Rokcet Scientist wrote:Minimalist wrote:If you start piling up anything it will, of necessity, be wider at the bottom than at the top. This is for stability not symbolism.
Once you get the idea to do it subsequent kings will look to out do their predecessors in their devotion to "the gods." That's human nature and especially kingly-nature.
"Kingly"?
Every stupid goat wants to be the king of the hill!
kbs2244 wrote:But there is a big difference between a pile of rocks and a pyramid.
One is pretty informal.
The other is designed.
kbs2244 wrote:Yes,
Bit my question is why, when they seemed to be happy with the pile of rocks concept, did they make the sudden shift to designed pyramids?
It just seems like there had to be some kind of outside influence.
kbs2244 wrote:I was thinking of possible interaction with some remnants of the Nan Madol culture.
It supposedly collapsed around AD1500
Return to Australia & Oceania, Antarctica
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests